| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | pgsql-announce(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Poll: Databases for Linux |
| Date: | 2000-03-01 04:02:44 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0003010000390.434-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
As Jeff mentioned earlier today, there is a poll going on at
http://www.linux.com that asks:
Several high-quality databases are available for Linux. Which database,
if any, does your company primarily use with its Linux servers?
Right now, PostgreSQL is lagging MySQL 21% to 48% ...
Who hasn't voted? :) Get out there and make yourself heard, eh?
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-03-01 04:20:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux |
| Previous Message | Ed Loehr | 2000-02-29 15:09:45 | Re: [GENERAL] Another Database Poll |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-03-01 04:20:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2000-03-01 01:31:34 | Re: [GENERAL] "LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock" |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-03-01 04:20:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux |
| Previous Message | Christopher Sawtell | 2000-03-01 03:26:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |