Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Poll: Databases for Linux

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-announce(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Poll: Databases for Linux
Date: 2000-03-01 04:02:44
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0003010000390.434-100000@thelab.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-announcepgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
As Jeff mentioned earlier today, there is a poll going on at
http://www.linux.com that asks:

Several high-quality databases are available for Linux.  Which database,
if any, does your company primarily use with its Linux servers?

Right now, PostgreSQL is lagging MySQL 21% to 48% ...

Who hasn't voted? :)  Get out there and make yourself heard, eh? 

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org 


Responses

pgsql-announce by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-03-01 04:20:17
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux
Previous:From: Ed LoehrDate: 2000-02-29 15:09:45
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Another Database Poll

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-03-01 04:20:17
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux
Previous:From: Christopher SawtellDate: 2000-03-01 03:26:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-03-01 04:20:17
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2000-03-01 01:31:34
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] "LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock"

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group