Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql

Personal opinion: I think we are coming across a little harder on Peter
then most of us are intending :( I think we're blowing a few
misconceptions a little out of proportion, which is just fueling things
further ...

Peter, I agree with Thomas about the work you are doing, I just tend to
come across 'strong' when I disagree with something ...

On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > I totally see what you're saying and I'm going to try
> > to address it. But there was noone who said anything
> > about this so far.
>
> OK, an overdue comment: the new psql is great (current and future
> discrepencies excepted of course ;)
>
> Thanks for sticking with it Peter; we've already got a good
> foundation, and as we stumble across these minor differences in
> behavior it will get even closer to an ideal interface.
>
> My current favorite feature: command history across psql sessions.
> When testing I can jump in and out of psql after rebuilding the
> backend and can just uparrow to my last test command. Nice. And for
> this case, I won't complain about a lack of backward compatibility :))
>
> - Thomas
>
> --
> Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
> South Pasadena, California
>
> ************
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org