Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.3] 'attribute not found'

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.3] 'attribute not found'
Date: 2000-01-28 03:48:42
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0001272348050.555-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > explain SELECT w.counter_id,
> > ( date_part('month', w.stat_date) || '/' ||
> > date_part('day', w.stat_date) || '/' ||
> > date_part('year', w.stat_date) || ' 00:00:00')::datetime as
> > dayperiod,
> > r.referrer_id, count(w.referrer_hits)
> > FROM webhit_referer_raw w, referrer_data r, referrer_link l
> > WHERE w.stat_date < 'Jan 25 2000'
> > AND w.referrer_url = r.referrer
> > AND l.counter_id = w.counter_id
> > AND l.stat_date = dayperiod
> > AND l.referrer_id = r.referrer_id
> > GROUP BY dayperiod, counter_id, referrer_id
> > ORDER BY counter_id, dayperiod;
>
> > I get:
> > ERROR: attribute 'dayperiod' not found
>
> > I'm guessing right now its on: "AND l.stat_date = dayperiod"
>
> Yup.
>
> > Should that not work?
>
> No, it shouldn't. Labeling SELECT output columns with AS doesn't
> affect the namespace visible in the WHERE clause (since WHERE is
> "upstream" of the SELECT outputs). If we had sub-selects in FROM,
> I believe that AS would determine the column names seen outside
> the sub-select ("downstream").
>
> Also, you can use the AS names in ORDER BY, which is also "downstream"
> of forming the results. (I think we currently accept them in GROUP BY
> as well, but I suspect that that is not in compliance with the
> standard...)

Yup, I'm using it in both the GROUP and ORDER BY ... not a big deal
though, the query looked like hell anyway :)

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Brothers 2000-01-28 03:51:40 Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Previous Message John Brothers 2000-01-28 03:48:39 Re: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4