Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: phd2(at)earthling(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-announce(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch
Date: 2000-01-06 16:42:37
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0001061241510.18498-100000@thelab.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-announcepgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Oleg Broytmann wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > So far, from what i've seen, its a nice tool ... I like the fact that
> > there is no such thing as "Search downtime", since the indexer can run
> > while ppl are seaching.  With ht/Dig, while it was indexing, the databases
> > were down and you couldn't search anything...
> 
>    You are certailnly wrong, as htDig has a concept of "work files"
> (option -a).

Ah, okay...

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org 


In response to

pgsql-announce by date

Next:From: Ed LoehrDate: 2000-01-06 20:30:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch
Previous:From: Oleg BroytmannDate: 2000-01-06 16:20:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-01-06 16:43:46
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] btree: failed to add item to
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-01-06 16:40:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2000-01-06 16:44:21
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres object orientation
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-01-06 16:35:44
Subject: Re: [BUGS] problem creating index in 6,5,3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group