Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: David Heinecke <dheinecke(at)axent(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?
Date: 1999-09-29 03:14:23
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.10.9909290014040.33998-100000@thelab.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Just curious, but why is using the CyWin stuff not an option? *raised
eyebrow*



On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, David Heinecke wrote:

> Yeah,
> 
> That is pretty much the short of it.  My greatest concern undertaking an
> effort like this is the resultant #ifdef/#else/#endif mess that I will need
> to make of the code.  We do a lot of cross-platform development here and
> ultimately the code begins to look very ugly to anything except a
> preprocessor.  The alternative is to put most of the nt-specific code in
> separate files, but then we would have to merge over the newer code from the
> CVS repository.  It is not a job that I look forward to, but our unix
> customers are clamoring for PostGRE on the backend and our non-unix
> customers are not going to be satisfied with MySQL.  Sucks to be me, I
> guess.
> 
> Dave Heinecke
> Senior Software Engineer
> Axent Technologies
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 10:47 AM
> To: David Heinecke
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?
> 
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > My company is pretty impressed with postgre on unix, but we also need a
> > native port for nt (it is not an option to have our customers install
> cygwin
> > on their production systems.)  Ideally we would like to see the backend
> > running as a native service under nt.  We have the resources to do the
> port
> > ourselves (I will probably end up doing the work myself), but I was
> > wondering if there was already an effort underway to develop something
> like
> > this.
> 
> Yikes, you want to run the PostgreSQL backend without Unix simulator
> support!  Wow, that sounds like a big job.
> 
> I know of no one who has done this.  You can see from the FAQ item that
> people have running under U/Win too, but I that is a Unix emulator too.
> 
> Seems like you would basically be writing another emulator for NT to do
> the things we do under Unix, no?
> 
> -- 
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
>   maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
> 
> ************
> 

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org 


In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1999-09-29 03:15:57
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port?
Previous:From: Stephane AlnetDate: 1999-09-29 00:17:38
Subject: cancel <37F15A2A.82C50D3B@u-picardie.fr>

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group