From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: your mail |
Date: | 1999-08-02 19:29:23 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.10.9908021628520.27315-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Drop'ng now...the MySQL camp appears to have finally heard about it...we
are still just slightly above 60%...
On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Peter Mount wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> >
> > LinuxDev.Net is currently conducting a poll of "The Most Popular DBMS", at
> > http://linuxdev.net. Currently, PostgreSQL ia in second place, with 21
> > out of 84 votes, while MySQL is in first with 33...
> >
> > Even if you aren't using Linux, take a minute and make your vote...we like
> > to see PostgreSQL on top, no? :)
>
> Well, I've just voted, and now were 1st with 64.8% (to mysql's 22.2). I
> think your plea for votes worked :-)
>
> --
> Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
> Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
> PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
> Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rafał Cygnarowski | 1999-08-02 20:36:17 | |
Previous Message | Peter Mount | 1999-08-02 18:50:09 | Re: your mail |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Jennis | 1999-08-02 21:26:19 | Re: [GENERAL] LinuxWorld Editors' Choice Awards - Finalist Status |
Previous Message | Peter Mount | 1999-08-02 18:50:09 | Re: your mail |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 1999-08-02 20:00:14 | Any 6.5.2 activities ? |
Previous Message | G. Anthony Reina | 1999-08-02 18:54:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Louis Bertrand | 1999-08-02 19:36:01 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: your mail |
Previous Message | Jens Glaser | 1999-08-02 19:23:07 | sigh .. another bug in the JDBC driver (ResultSetMetaData.getColumnDisplaySize) |