> Or else we should only list Linux without naming a distor at all.
> 
> > should we bother listing it?)
> 
> I don't think so. No distro is still libc based AFAIK.

true, however not all people are running the most up to date
slackware (7.0) and afaik versions before 7 were not glibc2 based.

perhaps 4 was, but i think it was short lived compared to the
3.x series.


Jeff MacDonald
jeff(at)pgsql(dot)com

In response to

• Re: Call for porting reports at 2000-04-02 08:07:50 from Michael Meskes

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Thomas Lockhart	Date: 2000-04-02 21:06:03
	Subject: Re: "list index out of range" in C++ Builder 4
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2000-04-02 17:30:05
	Subject: Re: Crash on UPDATE in 7.0beta3