> Or else we should only list Linux without naming a distor at all.
> > should we bother listing it?)
> I don't think so. No distro is still libc based AFAIK.
true, however not all people are running the most up to date
slackware (7.0) and afaik versions before 7 were not glibc2 based.
perhaps 4 was, but i think it was short lived compared to the
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2000-04-02 21:06:03|
|Subject: Re: "list index out of range" in C++ Builder 4|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-04-02 17:30:05|
|Subject: Re: Crash on UPDATE in 7.0beta3 |