Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c'

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)hub(dot)org>, committers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c'
Date: 1999-03-03 03:15:50
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9903022314480.59717-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> > Modified Files:
> > parse.h gram.c
> > Log Message:
> > Someone forgot to commit gram.c and parse.h after his latest
> > set of updates to gram.y.
>
> I didn't forget! istm that we risk cvs bloat by checking in derived
> files like gram.c, when there are probably minor differences in how each
> system generates them. So I don't usually check in those files when we
> are deep in the middle of hacker development. Of course, that could be
> the wrong thing to (not) do...

Would have to agree here...developers *should* have the tools on their
systems required to generate this...these should only be
generated/committed as part of our pre-release checklist...

I think there are slightly more important things to worry about during
development...no? :)

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-03-03 03:26:38 Re: [PORTS] Port Bug Report: Error with date_part when checking month
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-03-03 02:53:46 RE: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? again