From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)hub(dot)org>, committers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/parser parse.h gram.c' |
Date: | 1999-03-03 03:15:50 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.9903022314480.59717-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> > Modified Files:
> > parse.h gram.c
> > Log Message:
> > Someone forgot to commit gram.c and parse.h after his latest
> > set of updates to gram.y.
>
> I didn't forget! istm that we risk cvs bloat by checking in derived
> files like gram.c, when there are probably minor differences in how each
> system generates them. So I don't usually check in those files when we
> are deep in the middle of hacker development. Of course, that could be
> the wrong thing to (not) do...
Would have to agree here...developers *should* have the tools on their
systems required to generate this...these should only be
generated/committed as part of our pre-release checklist...
I think there are slightly more important things to worry about during
development...no? :)
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1999-03-03 03:26:38 | Re: [PORTS] Port Bug Report: Error with date_part when checking month |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 1999-03-03 02:53:46 | RE: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? again |