RE: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA

On Sun, 15 Nov 1998, Taral wrote:

> Hear ye! Hear ye!
>
> I've just started stressing my brain on the CORBA 2 docs... It turns out
> that CORBA will be completely compatible with the existing system.
>
> postmaster will register a "method server" with the ORB (which is a separate
> process in mico, at least). A "method server" is one which requires a
> separate process for every method invocation. Which is basically what we do
> now with our one-backend-per-connection system. At least until the backend
> is thread-safe, we're stuck with it. When the backend is thread-safe, we can
> switch to "unshared server" where we have one per database. :)
>
> Taral
>
> P.S. When will that corba-specific list be set up? I'm sure that well over
> half of the list didn't care one bit about what I just said.

See Bruce's post...discussion is moved to pgsql-interfaces...

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org