Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
Date: 1998-10-30 02:21:47
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> > I just committed inet regression test fixes and resolved the
> > "@" operator problem.
> Great!  I think that means it's safe to put out a BETA4, Marc.

	Done, BETA4 is rolled...

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ 
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org 

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-10-30 02:23:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] v6.4-BETA3 problems with FreeBSD
Previous:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-10-30 02:15:18
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/include/catalog pg_operator.h'

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group