Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h
Date: 1998-10-29 05:36:53
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9810290135540.28793-100000@thelab.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> >         Bruce, can you and Thomas go through Tom's patch with a fine
> > toothed comb before its committed?  this close to release (5days!)
> 
> I'm sure they are good things, and Tom Lane has been careful and
> thoughtful about what he does in past patches (and sticks around to pick
> up the pieces :). Does the regression test still behave in all other
> respects Tom?

	Quite frankly, this close to the release, I'd kinda ask the same
if it were any of the other committers too...I'm not really singling out
Tom :)

> I'm a bit worried about keeping up with the docs schedule. So if I look
> at these tables, and if my docs get behind, can you consider giving me a
> couple of days to recover (only if I need it)? I'm out of town this
> weekend too, which doesn't help...

	Consider it done...if I hear nothing from you, I'll still consider
Monday a go...

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org 


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Billy G. AllieDate: 1998-10-29 05:42:08
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] make install fails in perl5 ...
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 1998-10-29 05:36:31
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another bug in pg_operator.h

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group