Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again
Date: 1998-10-28 02:12:33
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9810272212090.25965-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Tom Lane wrote:

> Someone checked in code that assumes vsnprintf() exists.
>
> Should be cool, we have an emulation right? Well, no.
> configure sets up to build port/snprintf.c if snprintf()
> doesn't exist. HPUX, for one, has that but not vsnprintf.
>
> I guess the right fix is for configure to check for *both*
> snprintf and vsnprintf --- anyone see a problem with that?

After v6.4 is released, sounds great to me...before, I send guys
around to break fingers :)

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Taral 1998-10-28 02:22:06 RE: [HACKERS] Re: Configure problem, redux (was Re: TCL installationtroubles)
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-10-28 02:11:43 Re: [HACKERS] Sigh, build is broken again