| From: | Tom Samplonius <tom(at)sdf(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ralf Mattes <rm(at)mh-freiburg(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Michael Graff <explorer(at)flame(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Rather incorrect text in admin guide |
| Date: | 2000-12-31 18:26:08 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.10012311025050.16414-100000@misery.sdf.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Ralf Mattes wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 07:05:41PM -0800, Tom Samplonius wrote:
> > Also NFSv2 is limited to 2GB, even if the client and server have no
> > issues. It is a protocol thing that is fixed in NFSv3. I doubt that
> > anyone is putting their postgres databases on a NFS server, but you never
> > know.
>
> It would be a bad idea to put the database on NFS but the paragraph
> talks about possible problems during pg_dump and it doesn't seem
> too unreasonable to dump a database to an NFS-mounted area.
Well NetApp has gone through quite a bit of work getting their NFS
filers Oracle and MS-SQL certified. There are extensive tech notes on the
Netapp site about Oracle and MS-SQL on NFS servers.
> Ralf Mattes
>
> P.S: Happy new year :-)
Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-31 22:42:34 | Re: Postgres ignoring RTree for geometric operators |
| Previous Message | Ralf Mattes | 2000-12-31 12:31:34 | Re: Rather incorrect text in admin guide |