Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: bmccoy(at)lan2wan(dot)com, ahayes(at)ingenia(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products
Date: 1998-07-22 18:26:49
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980722142629.23582P-100000@hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Brett W. McCoy wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Amos Hayes wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Has there ever been any discussion about a new name? It doesn't matter to
> > > > me but it would seem that with the current discussions about promotion and
> > > > competition, it might help to have a more "public friendly" name. It is
> > > > not obvious to me what a "postgres" is nor what it would do if I were to
> > > > install it. Granted that "oracle", "informix", and "sybase" are all a
> > > > little strange too, but they give hints (oracle, inform, base) about
> > > > containing knowledge. They also seem to roll off the tongue a little
> > > > easier.
> > > 
> > > Actually, I think Postgres originally came out of the Ingres family, 
> > 
> > 	Other way around, actually...Ingres is a branch off the original
> > Postgres source code...
> 
> University Ingres was first, then commercial Ingres was a split-off. 
> PostgreSQL is based on University Ingres.

	I stand corrected...I didn't even *know* there was a University
Ingres :(



In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Brett W. McCoyDate: 1998-07-22 18:53:12
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-07-22 18:12:40
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group