Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)lan2wan(dot)com>
Cc: Amos Hayes <ahayes(at)ingenia(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products
Date: 1998-07-22 17:43:10
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980722134121.23582N-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Brett W. McCoy wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Amos Hayes wrote:
>
> > Has there ever been any discussion about a new name? It doesn't matter to
> > me but it would seem that with the current discussions about promotion and
> > competition, it might help to have a more "public friendly" name. It is
> > not obvious to me what a "postgres" is nor what it would do if I were to
> > install it. Granted that "oracle", "informix", and "sybase" are all a
> > little strange too, but they give hints (oracle, inform, base) about
> > containing knowledge. They also seem to roll off the tongue a little
> > easier.
>
> Actually, I think Postgres originally came out of the Ingres family,

Other way around, actually...Ingres is a branch off the original
Postgres source code...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brett W. McCoy 1998-07-22 17:52:35 Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products
Previous Message Jeffrey Napolitano 1998-07-22 17:30:27 Moving Databases