| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Hartwig <daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jose' Soares Da Silva" <sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it>, PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, hackers postgres <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report |
| Date: | 1998-06-02 16:34:40 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.3.96.980602123151.12843K-100000@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, David Hartwig wrote:
> > O.S.: We choose Linux for his proved reliability.
*quiet snicker*
> > 2. As PostgreSQL doesn't allow an "ORDER BY" on columns not
> > included in the target list of the "SELECT", (I know that it is
> > SQL/92 standard, but IMO it's a fool thing), therefore, is not possible
> > to have the "dynaset "sorted for any field that is different from
> > the key (in our case the useless OIDs).
> >
>
> This fix is in alpha and will be in the 6.4 release. I do not know when
> 6.4 is slated for release, but I am willing to send you a patch if it is
> critical for you to proceed.
6.4 is slated for Oct 1st...we had thought Sep 1st, except that,
being the tail end of the summer, alot of ppl tend to be in limbo
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jackson, DeJuan | 1998-06-02 16:37:38 | RE: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] custom types and optimization |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-06-02 16:21:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 1998-06-02 17:11:41 | Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-06-02 16:21:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC is slow with M$-Access Report |