Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] custom types and optimization

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] custom types and optimization
Date: 1998-06-01 14:06:57
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980601095613.448U-100000@hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > postgresql=> select count(name) from register;
> > count
> > -----
> >  1361
> > (1 row)
> > 
> > 	Not bad...but I don't imagine that's a tenth of all the users, is
> > it?
> 
> Wow, that is a big number, and the 10% is probably correct.  I don't
> think I am even in there.

	I know I'm not ;(

> How can we reverse the "bad publicity" and get people to start looking
> at us again?

	Testimonials?  Not fanatical statements...something intelligent
like what Herouth Maoz wrote?  Maybe with a pointer to the project that
he/she used PostgreSQL for?  Start up a 'User Comments and Projects'
page...?

	How many ppl are actually using the 'Powered by' logo on their
sites?  Actually, just looking at that, and am I the only one that finds
it unreadable?  I can barely even see that its a 'cat'...



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-06-01 14:12:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Query cancel and OOB data (fwd)
Previous:From: Herouth MaozDate: 1998-06-01 09:56:09
Subject: Re: Why Postgres (was Re: [HACKERS] custom types and optimization)

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Harry BiltzDate: 1998-06-01 20:04:14
Subject: unixware 2.1.2
Previous:From: Herouth MaozDate: 1998-06-01 09:56:09
Subject: Re: Why Postgres (was Re: [HACKERS] custom types and optimization)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group