Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] PostgreSQL and LDAP ?

From: "Matthew N(dot) Dodd" <winter(at)jurai(dot)net>
To: Gran Thyni <goran(at)bildbasen(dot)se>
Cc: Herouth Maoz <herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il>, PostgreSQL Hackers <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] PostgreSQL and LDAP ?
Date: 1998-04-27 13:41:27
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980427093922.21511F-100000@sasami.jurai.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Gran Thyni wrote:
> I saw something about a LDAP/PAM module.
> Supporting PAM-auth in pgsql would give us LDAP and much more.

PAM is rather evil.  The fact that one has to add 'support' for it should
be enough of an indicator.

/* 
   Matthew N. Dodd		| A memory retaining a love you had for life	
   winter(at)jurai(dot)net		| As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to
   http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53	
*/


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jose' Soares Da SilvaDate: 1998-04-27 14:25:11
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-04-27 13:27:00
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group