Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] PostgreSQL and LDAP ?

From: "Matthew N(dot) Dodd" <winter(at)jurai(dot)net>
To: Gran Thyni <goran(at)bildbasen(dot)se>
Cc: Herouth Maoz <herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il>, PostgreSQL Hackers <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] PostgreSQL and LDAP ?
Date: 1998-04-27 13:41:27
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980427093922.21511F-100000@sasami.jurai.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Gran Thyni wrote:
> I saw something about a LDAP/PAM module.
> Supporting PAM-auth in pgsql would give us LDAP and much more.

PAM is rather evil. The fact that one has to add 'support' for it should
be enough of an indicator.

/*
Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life
winter(at)jurai(dot)net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to
http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53
*/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jose' Soares Da Silva 1998-04-27 14:25:11 Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-04-27 13:27:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] retrieving varchar size