Re: [HACKERS] char types gone.

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Darren King <darrenk(at)insightdist(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] char types gone.
Date: 1998-03-24 03:45:01
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980323234028.324B-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Would be nice if stuff like that (and the money and geometrics) could be
> > compiled in in the same manner that Apache is a basic web server that lets
> > you pick and choose modules/features you want to build into it.
> >
> > I don't know how big of a performance boost it provides in the cache, but
> > removing the functions associated with the char types shrank the pg_proc
> > table from 906 to 842 entries or a bit over 7%.
> >
> > Want to shrink it further? Of those remaining 842, _230_ are for the geometric
> > types! Throw in 25 more for the cash/money functions. Bloat city if you
> > never use these things. Thirty percent could be moved out to contrib and
> > not missed by most postgres users.
> >
>
> Yes, but if they are never referenced, the cache is empty for those
> types. Unless there is some performance change with their removal, why
> remove them? Disk space of binary?

I have to agree here...unless a noticeable performance improvement
can be demonstrated, I really don't like a trend that moves towards
removing core features that make us unique, just cause it makes a table
just a little smaller...*shrug*

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PostgreSQL On Peanuts.roanoke.edu 1998-03-24 04:04:04 Foreign Keys
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-03-24 03:27:50 Re: [HACKERS] char types gone.