Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: David Gould <dg(at)illustra(dot)com>
Cc: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6
Date: 1998-03-17 07:40:44
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980317033838.402C-100000@thelab.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 16 Mar 1998, David Gould wrote:

> Just to fill me in, where does the mega patch fall in with the next release
> snapshot? That is, if this misses the mega patch is it waiting until 6.4?

	That is pretty much up to you, actually.  There is nothing wrong
with a clean patch for this being placed in the patches directory, if it
can be done shortly after the post-release patch.  Basically, starting
April 1st (or so), development basically starts up again, so backtracking
a patch from v6.4-alpha to v6.3 release can prove difficult :(


Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org 


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 1998-03-17 08:16:59
Subject: Re: Multi field hash indexes
Previous:From: Peter T MountDate: 1998-03-17 07:30:47
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group