Re: [HACKERS] postmaster crash and .s.pgsql file

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: James Hughes <jamesh(at)interpath(dot)com>
Cc: Goran Thyni <goran(at)bildbasen(dot)se>, maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postmaster crash and .s.pgsql file
Date: 1998-01-28 03:31:14
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980127232747.238J-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 27 Jan 1998, James Hughes wrote:

> On 27 Jan 1998, Goran Thyni wrote:
>
> :
> : On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> :
> : :
> : : When the postmaster crashes, it leaves the /tmp/.s.pgsql file in /tmp.
> : : Is there a way to auto-remove it after a postmaster crash?
> : :
>
> <snip>
>
> : I will look at removing the file on startup when I'm in there.
> :
> : Don't, it gets removed at shutdown except when crashing.
> : Removing at startup opens a whole new can of worms.
> : (You must no postmaster is not already running.)
> :
>
> How about in postmaster.c (arround line 427), when starting up...
>
> 1.) Check for the existence of a pid file.
>
> 2.) If one is there, read the pid and see if a back end is alive.
>
> 3.) If so, warn the user and exit.
>
> 4.) If not, check for and cleanup any leftover files.
>
> 5.) Continue with startup process.
>
> ...wouldn't this work OK?

A thought. Why not change the startup routine such that instead
of creating /tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432, create a subdirectory that contains both
the socket (.socket) and the PID file? Given time, I could see us adding
in some stats to the postmaster process, similar to named, where you
SIGUSR2 the process and it dumps a status file and that too could get
dumped there.

Just a thought...

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-01-28 03:36:29 Re: [HACKERS] Domain Problem?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-01-28 02:30:53 deadlocks