Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 7.0.2 regressions testing on Sparc running 2.5.1

From: ghaverla(at)freenet(dot)edmonton(dot)ab(dot)ca
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.0.2 regressions testing on Sparc running 2.5.1
Date: 2000-09-01 16:34:17
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-novice
The first ERROR listed in the diffs comes from CurrentMemoryContext not
being locate din  I've never had a bug like this to
trackdown before, so I don't know if the following is meaningful
or not.

This variable/symbol has an underfined address in every *.so
present.  If I go looking in just object modules, it is defined
in 3 with valid addresses, all other object modules which define
this symbol also have no defined address for it.
 00000004 g     0 .data  00000004 CurrentMemoryContext
 00000004 g     0 .data  00000004 CurrentMemoryContext
 00007954 g     0 .data  00000004 CurrentMemoryContext

Is this normal, that it is the same in 2 modules, but not 
the third?


Matter Realisations
Gordon Haverland, B.Sc. M.Eng. President
101  9504 182 St. NW    Edmonton, AB, CA  T5T 3A7
780/481-8019            ghaverla @

In response to


pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Alfred PerlsteinDate: 2000-09-01 18:01:07
Subject: Trigger on 0 updated?
Previous:From: Warren OdomDate: 2000-09-01 16:02:43
Subject: RE: sql with postgresql beginner

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group