| From: | "Ron Mayer" <ron(at)intervideo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Justin Clift" <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <nickf(at)ontko(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "elein" <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- starting Draft #5 |
| Date: | 2003-07-29 18:06:28 |
| Message-ID: | POEDIPIPKGJJLDNIEMBEAEIHDEAA.ron@intervideo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Justin Clift wrote:
> Nick Fankhauser wrote:[...]
> > "An Enterprise-Level Database, Free."
>
> How about:[...]
> "An Enterprise-Level Database, Saving You Money"
Curious about the term "Enterprise-Level" vs. "Enterprise"?
Sybase calls theirs an "Enterprise Database for Linux"
http://www.sybase.com/detail/1,6904,1024137,00.html
http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1019336
and MSFT & Borland use that phrase as well...
http://www.borland.com/news/press_releases/2003/06_02_03_borland_and_microsoft_team_to_deliver_solution.html
For my own enlightenment, do the terms mean something different?
Ron
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-07-29 18:09:57 | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #4 |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-07-29 17:03:29 | Press list for release -- Question |