| From: | Atsushi Ogawa <a_ogawa(at)hi-ho(dot)ne(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: regexp_replace |
| Date: | 2005-06-28 13:03:54 |
| Message-ID: | PIEMIKOOMKNIJLLLBCBBEEBBCJAA.a_ogawa@hi-ho.ne.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > I'm very glad to see this. But is a nicer name possible? To perl
> > programmers at least, "substitute" should make sense.
>
> What is the matter with replace? We already have replace:
>
> test=> \df replace
> List of functions
> Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types
> ------------+---------+------------------+---------------------
> pg_catalog | replace | text | text, text, text
>
I think that regexp_replace is a good name. It is easy to understand.
regards,
--- Atsushi Ogawa
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-06-28 13:26:07 | Re: regexp_replace |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-06-28 12:53:50 | Re: COPY FROM performance improvements |