Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

What else is needed for PITR?

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Pgsql-Docs(at)Postgresql(dot) Org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: What else is needed for PITR?
Date: 2004-08-17 20:42:28
Message-ID: NOEFLCFHBPDAFHEIPGBOOELJCCAA.simon@2ndquadrant.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Could I ask the general question:

"What else is needed for PITR?"

- What isn't clear about how PITR works? what it is or what its good for?
- What additional features are required?
- What additional tools are required to make it useful?
- What additional documentation do we want? (Assuming you've read what's
there)

I want to get the list out now, so we can see review what the priorities
are.

I'm particularly interested in everybody listening that might not feel they
could normally contribute to the discussion, though of course, all comments
are welcome.

Many of these may not be appropriate for 8.0, but we can add these to the
TODO list for 8.1.

Best regards, Simon Riggs


In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: John DeSoiDate: 2004-08-19 18:17:16
Subject: docs correction (8.0 beta)
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-08-17 19:15:18
Subject: 7.3.7 packaged ...

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2004-08-17 20:43:01
Subject: Re: Does psql use nested transactions?
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2004-08-17 20:32:45
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group