Re: Installing DBD::Pg module without Pg Database server

From: "Peter Darley" <pdarley(at)Kinesis-CEM(dot)com>
To: "Vivek Khera" <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Installing DBD::Pg module without Pg Database server
Date: 2001-12-05 17:31:28
Message-ID: NNEAICKPNOGDBHNCEDCPCEMHCBAA.pdarley@kinesis-cem.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Vivek,
I'm not absolutely sure about this, but I believe that I built the .pm on
one machine and copied it to my other machines that didn't have any
Postgresql stuff installed on them.
Thanks,
Peter Darley

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Vivek Khera
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:02 PM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Installing DBD::Pg module without Pg Database
server

>> My suggestion would be to build it on the machine that
>> has the db on it, and then just copy the .pm onto the other machines.

That wouldn't work anyway, since the .pm just pulls in the shared
object. If it were just a .pm file, then you wouldn't need to build
anything.

a> Yes, you need the client libraries on the machine to build it.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2001-12-05 17:32:19 Re: [GENERAL] java stored procedures
Previous Message Tielman J de Villiers 2001-12-05 17:10:04 Re: Selecting across Multiple Tables