Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL

From: Jason Hihn <jhihn(at)paytimepayroll(dot)com>
To: Bruno Baguette <bruno(dot)baguette(at)netcourrier(dot)com>,pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL
Date: 2003-01-20 14:42:03
Message-ID: NGBBLHANMLKMHPDGJGAPOEBECBAA.jhihn@paytimepayroll.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
It's OLD anyway - almost a year. And they obviously were only using Windows
to test on, so it couldn't have been a serious test ;-)

Just another reason to have native windows support... ahem. ;-)


-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bruno Baguette
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 8:50 AM
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] Server Databases Clash : NO mention of
PostgreSQL ?


Hello,

Does somebody knows why this eWeek article that does a benchmark of
theses Databases (DB2 7.2 ,SQL Server, MySQL,Oracle9i and ASE) whithout
having added PostgreSQL ?

Here's the URL of the article :
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,293,00.asp

Thanks in advance !

-------------------------------------------------
Bruno BAGUETTE - bruno(dot)baguette(at)netcourrier(dot)com


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Heather CarleDate: 2003-01-20 14:46:38
Subject: LinuxWorld/Computerworld story on PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Shridhar DaithankarDate: 2003-01-20 08:24:37
Subject: Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group