Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

FW: [GENERAL] Given: Win98, Cygwin, postgresql-7.0.3.tar.gz | Need: to make libpg/(++) libraries?

From: "Francis K Shim" <fshim(at)cawthra(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: FW: [GENERAL] Given: Win98, Cygwin, postgresql-7.0.3.tar.gz | Need: to make libpg/(++) libraries?
Date: 2001-04-12 18:07:21
Message-ID: NFBBKOFMGDBJAJIGBBDJOELECCAA.fshim@cawthra.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
If replying, please reply to

fshim(at)cawthra(dot)com

I am subscribed to pgsql-general, but not pgsql-ports.

Thanks,
Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Francis K Shim
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 3:00 AM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [GENERAL] Given: Win98, Cygwin, postgresql-7.0.3.tar.gz | Need:
to make libpg/(++) libraries?


Hi,

As the Subject line says, all I am looking to do is to make the libraries so
I can write some C/C++ postgresql client programs under Cygwin (under Win98)
using the GNU C/C++ compilers.  I guess I could use ODBC and MSVC++, but I
just don't want to get stuck in a rut.  I do not need to build any of the
server components, so I was hoping that the "configure" script would be
smart enough to produce make files that will make the rest of the package
with the necessary client libraries; however, it was clear as I was
monitoring the "make" output that I either need other libraries or I need to
restrict my "configure" options further.  The make encountered problems when
it started to compile "dllinit.c":

dllinit.c:49: warning: no previous prototype for '_cygwin_dll_entry'
dllinit.c:49: warning: no previous prototype for
'_cygwin_noncygwin_dll_entry'

This either caused or was caused by the dlltool to fail with the
port/SUBSYS.o:

dlltool: port/SUBSYS.o: no symbols

I am guessing it was caused by an incomplete SUBSYS.o object created from
compiling src/backend/port/dynloader.c... but I have not taken a detailed
look.  I am hoping that someone can point me in the right direction or tell
me what is missing.

Do I have the right package?  I seem to recall that there was some splitting
up of the package into 3 parts: client-only, server-only and common... but I
may be mixing that recollection with something else.

TIA,
Frank Shim


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-04-12 21:00:46
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL for WinNT
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-04-12 18:06:34
Subject: Re: Fw: Postgres on WinNT4 / SP5

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group