Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [PORTS] Windows NT binary

From: "Jens Skakkebaek" <jskakkebaek(at)bv2000(dot)com>
To: <rosner(at)scn(dot)org>, <pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [PORTS] Windows NT binary
Date: 1999-12-20 00:43:50
Message-ID: NDBBLCOBBMBMLKOHDKBACEJACBAA.jskakkebaek@bv2000.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Dan,

I think it would be a great idea.  I have spent more than a day to try and
compile and I still haven't been able to run it (I get a
STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION when running initdb).
Having the binaries would make it so much easier for people.

Jens
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
[mailto:owner-pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Dan Rosner
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 1999 11:38 AM
To: pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: [PORTS] Windows NT binary


Since I'm probably not the last poor soul struggling
to build postgresql on NT, I was wondering about
the relative pros/cons of distributing the binary.
Is there an NT binary available for the current postgres
6.5.3?  How much interest would there be in current
binaries if they existed?

--
Dan Rosner
Cascade Programming Group
rosner(at)scn(dot)org

************



In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Kevin LoDate: 1999-12-20 03:21:06
Subject: Re: Compiling Postgres on NT
Previous:From: Ling SHIDate: 1999-12-19 22:28:34
Subject: postgresql on Solaris 2.7

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group