Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: Re: int8 beta5 broken?

From: "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Date: 2001-02-28 17:12:48
Message-ID: NCBBKBDOOHHEJCJHLLPAOEMIINAA.ler@lerctr.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
Working on it.

Give me a couple of hours.

LER

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:04 AM
To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Larry Rosenman
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? 


Olivier PRENANT <ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr> writes:
> Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not
> used.

That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything
that even knows SSL exists.  Larry, can you confirm this behavior?

			regards, tom lane


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-02-28 17:19:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-02-28 17:04:10
Subject: Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-02-28 17:19:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-02-28 17:04:10
Subject: Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group