Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?

From: "Bo?ena Potempa" <Bozena(dot)Potempa(at)otc(dot)pl>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL+ Beta bug?
Date: 2002-11-22 16:38:42
Message-ID: MKEIIFDEFPOPHIPFIFJCEEGADHAA.Bozena.Potempa@otc.pl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc
>If it is implemented in the server I would implement it.
>However, it isn't implemented in the server and so
>there's no recommended way to store 0s in strings now.
>Even if 0s are stored in strings accidentally like your
>example shows, there are few code which take them into
>account and they would be lost before long. As for me
>I've never minded 0s in strings in the backend coding.
>
>I don't think your request is unreasonable but what
>you should request the change first seems from the
>backend side.

I will ask on pgsql-hackers and then return to ODBC.

Thank you very much for your help.

Bozena Potempa


In response to

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Graham VickrageDate: 2002-11-22 17:10:39
Subject: Re: Text field truncation problem
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2002-11-22 14:50:17
Subject: Re: Very large queries with ODBC

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group