I have been using the JDBC driver for a couple of months now. The only
limitation I have run into for my own uses is that calling executeUpdate()
does not return the number of rows effected by update or delete statement --
it always returns 0.
Is this a limitation of Postgresql (i.e. the backend does not provide this
info) or a limitation of the JDBC driver?
If it is not a limitation of the backend, does anyone have an idea if this
bug would be as easy to fix as it appears on the surface?
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Barry Lind||Date: 2001-10-27 03:26:47|
|Subject: Re: JDBC executeUpdate() does not return the number of rows effected|
|Previous:||From: Ned Wolpert||Date: 2001-10-26 19:22:58|
|Subject: Re: j2ee compatiable jdbc driver on jdbc.postgresql.org?|