Re: Redhat 7 and PgSQL

From: "Efrain Caro" <betsemes(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: "Jeff Hoffmann" <jeff(at)propertykey(dot)com>, Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Redhat 7 and PgSQL
Date: 2000-09-29 15:08:05
Message-ID: LAW2-OE19KJbGBSNfGW00001b9c@hotmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Forgive my ignorance. What is this no-upgrade policy issue about?

Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)propertykey(dot)com> writes:

> > >>> "Alfredo" <csib(at)mweb(dot)com(dot)na> 09/29/00 12:28PM >>>
> > I heard that MySQL is included in RH 7 instead of PgSQL. Is this true?
if
> > yes, anybody know why?
>
> i think the thing is that they added mysql because it's now GPL'd -- it
> wasn't in there before because it wasn't really "free" software.
> postgres (7.0.2) is indeed still in redhat 7, but with some of the
> comments on the list about the RPMs, it's possible that it may not stay
> as part of the distribution because of upgrading issues.

I've never said or indicated that.

That said, I dislike the current no-upgrade policy.

--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2000-09-29 15:12:04 Re: Redhat 7 and PgSQL
Previous Message Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= 2000-09-29 14:58:19 Re: Redhat 7 and PgSQL