Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas

From: "Iavor Raytchev" <iavor(dot)raytchev(at)verysmall(dot)org>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: "pgsql-interfaces" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"pgaccess - developers" <developers(at)pgaccess(dot)org>
Subject: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
Date: 2002-09-04 17:00:29
Message-ID: HKEIIDPFPDBMOMDLIEEGKEHECOAA.iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
Ross and Iavor:

> > > BTW, has the 'schema' tab been renamed yet? With actual
> > > schema
> > > in 7.3, that'll get confusing.
>
> > Not renamed yet.
>
> In which case, we need to come up with a different name. How
> does
> "diagrams" strike you all?

Hm... In MS Access it is called 'Relations' which sounds kind of
correct. Basically now we just display them, so 'Diagrams' could be
correct for us for now. In MS Access the relations are actually built
there. That's what I would like us to do - use the current 'Schema' tab
(they are not tabs anymore in the new interface) and make it able to
build relations (represented in the code with referential integrity).
Then 'Diagrams' would not fit, but 'Relations'. Also 'References'.

Iavor


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-09-04 17:02:44
Subject: Re: HISTORY updated, 7.3 branded
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-09-04 16:59:44
Subject: Re: HISTORY updated, 7.3 branded

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Brett SchwarzDate: 2002-09-04 17:07:59
Subject: Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
Previous:From: Brett SchwarzDate: 2002-09-04 16:57:09
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group