| From: | "Iavor Raytchev" <iavor(dot)raytchev(at)verysmall(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-interfaces" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgaccess - developers" <developers(at)pgaccess(dot)org> |
| Subject: | the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas |
| Date: | 2002-09-04 17:00:29 |
| Message-ID: | HKEIIDPFPDBMOMDLIEEGKEHECOAA.iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Ross and Iavor:
> > > BTW, has the 'schema' tab been renamed yet? With actual
> > > schema
> > > in 7.3, that'll get confusing.
>
> > Not renamed yet.
>
> In which case, we need to come up with a different name. How
> does
> "diagrams" strike you all?
Hm... In MS Access it is called 'Relations' which sounds kind of
correct. Basically now we just display them, so 'Diagrams' could be
correct for us for now. In MS Access the relations are actually built
there. That's what I would like us to do - use the current 'Schema' tab
(they are not tabs anymore in the new interface) and make it able to
build relations (represented in the code with referential integrity).
Then 'Diagrams' would not fit, but 'Relations'. Also 'References'.
Iavor
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-04 17:02:44 | Re: HISTORY updated, 7.3 branded |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-04 16:59:44 | Re: HISTORY updated, 7.3 branded |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brett Schwarz | 2002-09-04 17:07:59 | Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas |
| Previous Message | Brett Schwarz | 2002-09-04 16:57:09 | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data |