Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas

From: "Iavor Raytchev" <iavor(dot)raytchev(at)verysmall(dot)org>
To: "pgsql-interfaces" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgaccess - developers" <developers(at)pgaccess(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
Date: 2002-09-04 17:14:34
Message-ID: HKEIIDPFPDBMOMDLIEEGGEHHCOAA.iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces


Brett:

> But in relational theory, doesn't relations refer to what we commonly
> refer to as tables? I think this would be confusing as well.
> However, I
> do agree that it would be cool to have it automatically generated...

I am not an expert in relational theory... If it is so - then that's bad
name. But if the native speakers and relational theory experts (joke :)
agree that what we have now as 'Schema' can be called 'Diagrams' and
used for creating different documentations, etc., and what is left is
the referential integrity (looking at it and visual management) than we
can call the new thing just 'Visual referential integrity manager' :)))
if not too long...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-09-04 17:15:19 Re: findoidjoins
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-04 17:09:26 Beta1 schedule

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-09-04 17:56:46 Re: [ODBC] ODBC Driver moved to GBorg ...
Previous Message Brett Schwarz 2002-09-04 17:07:59 Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas