> But in relational theory, doesn't relations refer to what we commonly
> refer to as tables? I think this would be confusing as well.
> However, I
> do agree that it would be cool to have it automatically generated...
I am not an expert in relational theory... If it is so - then that's bad
name. But if the native speakers and relational theory experts (joke :)
agree that what we have now as 'Schema' can be called 'Diagrams' and
used for creating different documentations, etc., and what is left is
the referential integrity (looking at it and visual management) than we
can call the new thing just 'Visual referential integrity manager' :)))
if not too long...
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Joe Conway||Date: 2002-09-04 17:15:19|
|Subject: Re: findoidjoins|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-09-04 17:09:26|
|Subject: Beta1 schedule|
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Sullivan||Date: 2002-09-04 17:56:46|
|Subject: Re: [ODBC] ODBC Driver moved to GBorg ...|
|Previous:||From: Brett Schwarz||Date: 2002-09-04 17:07:59|
|Subject: Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas|