Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas

From: "Iavor Raytchev" <iavor(dot)raytchev(at)verysmall(dot)org>
To: "pgsql-interfaces" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"pgaccess - developers" <developers(at)pgaccess(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
Date: 2002-09-04 17:14:34
Message-ID: HKEIIDPFPDBMOMDLIEEGGEHHCOAA.iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
Brett:

> But in relational theory, doesn't relations refer to what we commonly
> refer to as tables? I think this would be confusing as well.
> However, I
> do agree that it would be cool to have it automatically generated...

I am not an expert in relational theory... If it is so - then that's bad
name. But if the native speakers and relational theory experts (joke :)
agree that what we have now as 'Schema' can be called 'Diagrams' and
used for creating different documentations, etc., and what is left is
the referential integrity (looking at it and visual management) than we
can call the new thing just 'Visual referential integrity manager' :)))
if not too long...


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2002-09-04 17:15:19
Subject: Re: findoidjoins
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-09-04 17:09:26
Subject: Beta1 schedule

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2002-09-04 17:56:46
Subject: Re: [ODBC] ODBC Driver moved to GBorg ...
Previous:From: Brett SchwarzDate: 2002-09-04 17:07:59
Subject: Re: [pgaccess-developers] the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group