> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: frank_lupo [mailto:frank_lupo(at)email(dot)it]
> > Sent: 26 February 2003 17:19
> > To: pgadmin-hackers
> > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] development language
> > I was thinking with which language, and which ambient it is
> > the best one for the future developments.
> > I have inasmuch as to the begun one to develop with
> > wxWindows, this is an optimal choice, but if you allow must
> > be made of the sagacities for several the systems operates to you.
> > You have never taken in consideration java?
> > I do not know it well, but I did not know well not even
> > visual basic. Optimal and a free ide of development is
> > NetBeans (http://www.netbeans.org/).
> > Thinks that this road could be held in consideration,
> > inasmuch as the not left development of the pgadmin3 completely.
> Hi Frank,
> I'm afraid I don't fully understand what you are saying, but yes, we
> have looked at Java, and a number of other technologies for pgAdmin III
> including QT, Python, TCL/Tk, C# and probably a few more I've forgotten.
> We decided up C++ and wxWindows, and have even got some way into the
> project, though both Mark & I have not touched it in a while due to
> commitments at work. The code to date can be found at
> http://cvs.pgadmin.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/pgadmin3/. It compiles on
> Windows, Linux and FreeBSD at the moment. Please feel free to take a
> look and have a go at some coding if you like.
> Regards, Dave.
excuse for my English, I only say that it would be useful not to compile for several the systems operated to you, is true that java it is slow but our problem is not this. The jdbc exists for postgres. Perhaps we will have of the advantages. Perhaps...
Frank Lupo (Wolf) !!
\ o o /
Prendi GRATIS l'email universale che... risparmia: http://www.email.it/f
Professionisti per le emergenze quotidiane della casa e della famiglia?
su QXservice trovi idraulici, imbianchini, baby sitter e tanti altri.
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=535&d=26-2
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Christoph_Becker||Date: 2003-02-26 21:37:12|
|Subject: Re: development language|
|Previous:||From: frank_lupo||Date: 2003-02-26 21:01:08|
|Subject: RE: development language|