Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: RI triggers and schemas

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>,"Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RI triggers and schemas
Date: 2002-03-27 05:12:32
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMEOCCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> An advantage of using OIDs is that we could forget the pushups that
> >> ALTER TABLE RENAME presently goes through to update RI triggers.
> 
> > I'm always suspicious about the spec if it makes RENAME easy.
> 
> Point taken ;-)

I don't get it???

Chris


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-03-27 05:24:13
Subject: compile bug in HEAD?
Previous:From: Alastair D'SilvaDate: 2002-03-27 04:49:51
Subject: Re: Binding PostgreSQL to a specific ip address

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group