Re: FreeBSD/alpha

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD/alpha
Date: 2001-12-19 02:48:52
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMENMCAAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I generally think it suspicious when one of the BSD ports varies from
> the other two, and here it would seem that it's wrong for freebsd to
> be out of step. I propose making the entry read
>
> float8/i.86-.*-freebsd=float8-small-is-zero
>
> Any comments from freebsd users out there? Are there any other freebsd
> platforms besides i86 and alpha? If so, how do they do on this test?

FreeBSD is i386 and Alpha only ATM. I've submitted reports for both. Could
you please tell me where I can make the modification you suggest above to
test it?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug McNaught 2001-12-19 02:55:37 Re: Concerns about this release
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2001-12-19 02:45:55 Re: Explicit config patch 7.2B4