Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Proposed GUC Variable

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,<pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed GUC Variable
Date: 2002-08-28 07:32:49
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOKEOOCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
I tested this patch and I can confirm that it works very well on
FreeBSD/Alpha!  This is such a cool feature - it's going to make my life so
much easier!

Do you think that 'original query: ..' looks a bit like bad english?  Should
it be properly capitalised?  ie. 'Original query: ...'?  Just nitpicking...

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Gavin Sherry
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2002 2:27 PM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Hackers; pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Proposed GUC Variable
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Gavin Sherry wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > > But we should have some default to print some of the query,
> > >
> > > Why?  So far you've been told by two different people (make that three
> > > now) that such a behavior is useless, and no one's weighed in in its
> > > favor ...
> >
> > I completely agree. Nothing wrong with adding another guc variable and
> > since it is a debug variable people expect lots of verbosity.
>
> Attached is the patch. debug_print_error_query is set to false by default.
>
> For want of a better phrase, I've prepended 'original query: ' to the
> error message to highlight why it is in the log.
>
> Gavin
>


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2002-08-28 07:59:48
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_attribute.attisinherited ?
Previous:From: Gaetano MendolaDate: 2002-08-28 07:30:13
Subject: unsubscribe

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2002-08-28 07:59:48
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_attribute.attisinherited ?
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2002-08-28 07:03:01
Subject: Re: rules regression test fix

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group