Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "John Gray" <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation
Date: 2002-04-15 01:23:21
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOGEBOCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
I'll give it a try sometime today.

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Monday, 15 April 2002 7:57 AM
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: John Gray; pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Commands/ directory reorganisation 
> 
> 
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, what time timeframe are we in for application of this patch?  If I
> > get OK from a few people in the next few hours, do I apply so the code
> > doesn't drift?
> 
> We should apply (or reject) quickly, since as long as the patch is
> outstanding it will be holding up other work in backend/commands/.
> I know it's in my way for further schema work, for example.
> 
> I'll try to look it over this evening; anyone else want to review it?
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org
> 


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-04-15 01:36:45
Subject: Re: BETWEEN Help
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-04-15 00:34:50
Subject: Re: Commands/ directory reorganisation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group