Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Kaare Rasmussen" <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Date: 2002-01-08 03:58:11
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOEEANCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
> Does this have the multiple "WITH xxx" clauses which were discussed
> earlier? That is a nonstarter for syntax. There are other places in the
> grammar having "with clauses" and multiple arguments or subclauses, and
> having the shift/reduce issues resolved...

I might be thicker than a whale sandwich (10 points if you can pick the
quote :) ), but can someone please tell me what a shift/reduce issue is,
exactly...

Thanks,

Chris


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-08 04:01:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-08 03:48:04
Subject: Re: ecpg compile error on AIX

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-01-08 04:01:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2002-01-08 03:47:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group