| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| Date: | 2003-01-30 06:01:37 |
| Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOCEEKCFAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
> Yeah. This is a pretty self-contained problem, it just needs someone
> who's motivated to work on it. Mostly what we need is to understand how
> we want to extend the previously-agreed-to I/O behaviors for IPv4 inet
> and cidr types into the v6 domain. (Or should we back up and ask if the
> inet/cidr division still makes sense in the v6 world? I hope so, but
> if not we should face up to it...)
Maybe we should create a new type 'inet6'???
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-30 06:04:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-30 05:55:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-30 06:04:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-30 05:55:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |