Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: prepareable statements

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Neil Conway" <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>,"PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: prepareable statements
Date: 2002-07-01 01:31:55
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAENOCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
> The syntax is largely SQL92 compliant, but not totally. I'm not sure how
> the SQL spec expects parameters to be set up in PREPARE, but I doubt
> it's the same way I used. And the SQL92 spec for EXECUTE is functionally
> similar, but uses a different syntax (EXECUTE ... USING INTO <rel>, I
> think). If someone can decipher the spec on these two points and
> can suggest what the proper syntax should be, let me know.

I'll have a read of the spec for you to see if I can decode something out of
it!  I think it's pretty essential we have full standard compliance on this
one!

Chris




In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Curt SampsonDate: 2002-07-01 02:50:14
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reduce heap tuple header size
Previous:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2002-06-30 16:24:05
Subject: english doc for tree module

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Curt SampsonDate: 2002-07-01 02:50:14
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reduce heap tuple header size
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2002-06-30 00:35:37
Subject: SQL99 doc update

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group