Re: elog() proposal

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog() proposal
Date: 2002-02-22 03:53:16
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAEIGCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> OK, let me throw out a modified proposal that attempts to deal with
> these issues, and avoids creating a complicated error reporting system
> that few will understand or be able to control.

Question: does any of this help with the problem (I assume it's a problem)
that a syntax error in a statement causes the transaction to be rolled back?

Very annoying in psql...

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-22 03:54:18 Re: elog() proposal
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-22 03:52:55 Re: elog() proposal