| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Neil Conway" <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Open 7.3 items |
| Date: | 2002-08-01 02:07:10 |
| Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAEHGCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > As for 7.3, maybe we can get that done in time of everyone likes it.
> > If we can't, what do we do? Do we re-add the secondary password file
> > stuff that most people don't like? My big question is how many other
> > PostgreSQL users figured out they could use the secondary password file
> > for username/db restrictions? I never thought of it myself. Maybe I
> > should ask on general.
>
> How many ppl that aren't subscribed to any of the lists are using this and
> are going to get burned royal when they upgrade to v7.3 without
> understanding it is gone?
I agree with Marc here - compatibility in this area might just be very
important (compared with some other lesser areas of incompatibility...)
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-01 02:09:11 | Question |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-01 02:06:07 | Re: Trimming the Fat, Part Deux ... |