Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: NOT NULL

From: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
Cc: sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: NOT NULL
Date: 2003-10-30 01:33:01
Message-ID: FFF0122F-0A78-11D8-B4BC-0003931A964A@kineticode.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: sfpug
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 05:27  PM, elein wrote:

> Well, you'll run into problems if there are
> any nulls hanging around int the column.

Right, duh. But I can check for that.

> What is the problem with alter table? Or
> are you not at that version?

I need to support back to 7.1, at least in theory. And besides, I don't 
think that alter table allows you to add NOT NULLs yet.

Regards,

David

-- 
David Wheeler                                     AIM: dwTheory
david(at)kineticode(dot)com                              ICQ: 15726394
http://www.kineticode.com/                     Yahoo!: dew7e
                                                Jabber: Theory(at)jabber(dot)org
Kineticode. Setting knowledge in motion.[sm]


In response to

Responses

sfpug by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2003-10-30 03:55:02
Subject: Re: NOT NULL
Previous:From: eleinDate: 2003-10-30 01:27:58
Subject: Re: NOT NULL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group