Re: Range Type constructors

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Range Type constructors
Date: 2011-02-10 19:38:22
Message-ID: FEE17989-F069-4EE1-8A54-4CA71E657100@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 10, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:

> This might solve the constructor problem nicely if we could do things
> like:
> RANGE[10,20)
> But I have a feeling that will either cause a bizarre problem with the
> grammar, or someone will think it's not very SQL-like.

I like it a lot better than the funkily-named functions you posted yesterday.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-10 19:42:35 Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2011-02-10 19:35:29 Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3