Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: table OCX control

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: 'Tim Finch' <pgadmin(at)timfinch(dot)cix(dot)co(dot)uk>,"Mark A(dot) Taff" <mark(at)libertycreek(dot)net>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: table OCX control
Date: 2002-03-08 20:20:51
Message-ID: FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB1047684@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Finch [mailto:pgadmin(at)timfinch(dot)cix(dot)co(dot)uk] 
> Sent: 08 March 2002 11:37
> To: Mark A. Taff
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] table OCX control
> 
> 
> In fact if we came up with a method of doing it Registry wise then 
> something like the view designer could determine its own 
> 'hives' and 'keys' 
> and not care how, for example, the left hand tree view in 
> pgAdmin stores 
> its own project related settings. What do you think Dave/Jean?

Hmm, you saw my earlier thoughts on this. Keep it optional, keep it simple.
I guess the best bet would be to come up with a spec proposal for us all to
consider. It might be worth keeping the Projects to-do item in mind while
developing this - as one of you said, it is related. Jean-Michel might have
some comments on that - it's his to-do item.

Regards, Dave.

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Tim FinchDate: 2002-03-09 11:10:09
Subject: Re: table OCX control
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2002-03-08 20:15:56
Subject: Re: CVS, MArk & Tim testing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group