Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: table OCX control

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: 'Tim Finch' <pgadmin(at)timfinch(dot)cix(dot)co(dot)uk>,"Mark A(dot) Taff" <mark(at)libertycreek(dot)net>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: table OCX control
Date: 2002-03-08 20:02:01
Message-ID: FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB1047680@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Finch [mailto:pgadmin(at)timfinch(dot)cix(dot)co(dot)uk] 
> Sent: 08 March 2002 11:54
> To: Mark A. Taff
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] table OCX control
> 
> 
> You're right, Yes it should and no its not. Now to this end, 
> whats the gas 
> on us using commercially available OCX controls. I have a 
> legal bought copy 
> of VSView, which contains an OCX that is a 'scrollable pane' 
> - it takes 
> care of all that side of things. There are no financial 
> licensing issues 
> with distributing it, but the problem of course is its 
> unlikely you guys 
> have a developer's license for it... Thought I'd ask.

No commercial controls thank you. Standard redistributable Microsoft ones,
or our own only. Too many licencing and compatibility problems otherwise.

Regards, Dave.

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2002-03-08 20:10:53
Subject: Re: Wine..?
Previous:From: Tim Finch, FosterFinch LtdDate: 2002-03-08 11:57:44
Subject: CVS, MArk & Tim testing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group