Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: 'Michael Meskes' <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your
Date: 2002-02-28 09:03:41
Message-ID: FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB1047648@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Meskes [mailto:meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> Sent: 28 February 2002 07:04
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] eWeek Poll: Which database is most
> critical to your
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:39:16AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I cannot believe that caching results for
> literally-identical queries
> > is a win, except perhaps for the most specialized (read brain dead)
>
> I don't think they are brain dead. Well that is at first I
> thought so too, but then thinking some more it made sense.
> After all MySQL is used mostly for web pages and even your
> dynamic content doesn't change that often. But in between
> there are thousands of concurrent access that all execute the
> very same statement. This feature makes no sense IMO for the
> "normal" use we both probably had in mind when first reading,
> but for this web usage I see a benefit if it's implementable.

Everytime someone browses http://pgadmin.postgresql.org/ this is exactly
what's going on, as well as (I imagine) with Vince's interactive docs.

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Paul ARGUDO 2002-02-28 09:32:48 Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-02-28 09:00:00 Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c )